Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Seel Kontest Part 2

To Recap:

Mayor Correia decided, on his own, to change the Fall River city seal and motto to "Pride City Wide." The funny part is that the seal/motto is misspelled and should be "Pride Citywide" as pointed out by UpandOut in Seel Kontest 1 .

I solicited alternate city seals from blog readers...I have 3 total - here they are:





and of course 'UpAndOut's' original "Pride City WIDE"

Monday, July 14, 2008

CITY ADM Tax Complaint

I finally got up the nerve to drop a dime on Alan Silva for not registering his car in MA. Click here if you don't know what I am talking about.

click to enlarge

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Ignorance....featuring Bob Correia, Joan Menard, and unaccounted voices of the state legislature

The Massachusetts State Legislature chose to ignore the voices of 7,561 Fall River registered voters and proceed with the Fire Chief change from civil service to contract.

As ignorant as they come, State Senator Joan Menard- former boss/mentor of Adam "Chappy" Chapdelaine said in the Herald News, that in her 10 years in the Senate and 20 more in the House, she had never seen a voter referendum petition filed against a Home Rule request. “I give them credit. They’re concerned about it." ......YES WE ARE CONCERNED! yet a group of politicians lead by Bob Correia and Joan Menard willfully chose to ignore our voices.

Please do 2 things:
1) DO NOT VOTE FOR BOB CORREIA OR JOAN MENARD EVER AGAIN
2) PLEASE Contact Governor Patrick to voice your concern about
the situation - he is able to veto the bill. Remind him about
the 7,561 registered voters that said NO to a contract fire chief.

CONTACT GOVERNOR PATRICK HERE (As soon as possible):
Phone: 617.725.4005
888.870.7770 (in state)
Fax: 617.727.9725
Email form = click here

Monday, July 7, 2008

Seel Kontest

Thank you to Fall River-tastic reader 'upandout' who added this comment to my blog regarding the incorrect spelling of Mayor Correia's new "Pride City Wide" motto:

"Pride "City Wide" is apparently not related to spelling.

I believe Citywide is correct, unless they are referring to the width of the city's residents (above average obesity levels). In that case, "City Wide" is appropriate, but hardly anything to be proud of.

Noticed this just before the inauguration, but because my family and some friends support the mayor (I certainly do not), and because I have a slightly evil side, I didn't tell them. I've just been giggling since January, but couldn't stand it anymore, so I broke my silence here :)"

I am disappointed that I didn't notice the error before, but I guess I was entranced by the general lameness of the motto. I verified citywide in the Merriam-Webster dictionary,
citywide One entry found. citywide
Main Entry: city·wide
Pronunciation:
\ˈsi-tē-ˌwīd\
Function: adjective
including or involving all parts of a city
Thanks to the creativity of 'upandout,' we don't need to change our errantly spelled motto, we can just adopt his new seal design to go along with it.

Does anyone else have a creative seal design & motto for Fall River? If I get enough suggestions I will post them and offer a poll to vote - the winner will receive a very special prize (details to come)....! If you have a seal or motto suggestion, email it to me at shamrockblogger@gmail.com

Sunday, July 6, 2008

Deja Vu Prediction

A very interesting article from the 1999 archives of Southcoast Today, recounts the tale of the Dockside Lounge. Here is an excerpt (but I recommend reading the full article):

"The Dockside was a waterfront bar on the city pier catering to what we can kindly call a 'subculture' frequented by yours truly, the late Joe Savitch and his entourage and assorted hard-digging and drinking pirates who purportedly scratched for illegal shellfish in the dark of night.

The fitfully raucous joint teetered on the water's edge, far enough not to infringe on the public's right to serenity. Patrons feeling their oats sometimes leapt from the roof into the river accompanied by moonlight and cathartic, blood curdling war cries. Now and then the pirates had a beef that led to fisticuffs. But the Dockside paid its taxes, contributing its share for public schools and infrastructure.

Along came the nearby Point Gloria condo development. If memory serves well, some said at the time that developers Robert and James Karam approached the administration of Mayor Carlton Viveiros saying they wanted the land for possible adjunct development as a marina or motel. So the Dockside, against the wishes of the owners, patrons and probably assessors who hate to erode the tax base, was acrimoniously taken by eminent domain and demolished. The Redevelopment Authority now has the land.

If that's the way it went down, it was arrogant and unproductive. It sunk a taxpaying business and expunged property from the tax rolls. That was about 20 years ago and the site hasn't yielded a cent in taxes since.

In essence, it gave the Karams control of the land via options without liability or paying taxes. Now, said Ken Fiola, executive vice president of the city's economic development office, the Karam option has ceased and nobody has first dibs on the land -- including himself as rumor would have it. But it still isn't producing tax revenue. "
Not only did this move rid the city of a viable tax producing waterfront business, but we now know that the land is a brownfield site that will cost the city $1-3.5 million dollars to clean before anything new can be built.

And where did the Karam's go? I am guessing they lost interest in the site when the possibility of a huge brownfield clean-up bill faced them.

With the renewed discussions of the state pier "revitalization," hopefully the city/Mayor Correia will not make the same mistake they did with the city pier by allowing the Karams to have a hand in any pier projects. Keep in mind that the Karams are Correia campaign contributors and Bob is very honorable when it comes to repaying his supporters.

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

Improve this Caption

Photo from the Southcoast Tribune at the Nokona Bat Factory


Can you offer a better caption? What is David thinking as he and his expensive jacket get attacked with a pride pin?
______________________________________________________
Courtesy of Fall River Community - The Simpsons version of Bob vs. Ortiz = Mr. Burns vs. Don Mattingly

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

City (property) for Sale

_______________________________________________________
From the 6/30/08 Herald News

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
RFP 09-01

RFP TITLE: Sale of City Owned Real Estate

The City of Fall River through the Purchasing
Department is offering a city owned parcel of
land for sale, at the following location:
84 Danforth Street. Proposal packages may be
obtained at the Purchasing Department, One
Government Center, Fall River, MA 02722 between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00p.m. each business day until
the scheduled proposal submission date and time.

Proposals will be opened and publicly read in
the Purchasing Department, Room 237, One
Government Center at 11:00a.m. on Monday, July
28, 2008.

The City of Fall River reserves the right to
waive any informalities or irregularities in the
proposals received or to reject any and all
proposals, or to accept proposals deemed to be
in the best interest of the City of Fall River.

The Mayor and the City Council will make

the award.

ARLENE ROBINETTE
PURCHASING AGENT
__________________________________________________________


84 Danforth Street is about to become a hot piece of property Click here for a map or Click here to do a Fall River property search. It is located very close to Route 79 and the downtown waterfront. The proposed waterfront revitalization includes plans that would add tremendous value to 84 Danforth by possibly taking down Route 79 and replacing it with a boulevard. The purpose of the project would be to connect downtown to the waterfront and in doing so this city property for sale would likely have direct access to the waterfront. According to a Herald News article, the project anticipates shops, office space, a marina, a restaurant and future rail transportation station. What a great spot to own property!

So which F.O.B. (friend of Bob) will beat out the competition and get to purchase this property? The Request for Proposal retains the right of the City to "reject any and all proposals." Will Bob and his 6 city councilors reject perfectly good proposals so an F.O.B. can buy the property? It will be interesting to find out.

The city website lists Requests for Proposals on their main page but this Request was suspiciously absent from the list.

My personal guess is that a Karam (but that seems too obvious) will have the winning proposal -Any other guesses/predictions?

__________________________________________________________

UPDATE 7/5/08

This RFP has now been added to the City Website